維基百科:關注度 (網站)

此頁是英語維基百科的關注度指引，但中文維基百科尚無採納共識。
此頁直到社群採納前都是論述，內容僅供參考。
若您認為此論述有成為正式指引的價值，建議參見英語維基百科的對應方針，並針對社群現況完善此論述的內容，再到互助客棧提議和參與討論。

捷徑

本文提供一些粗略指引，供中文維基百科編輯者參考，以決定任何形式的互聯網站相關內容，不論是該網站的內容還是網站本身，是否值得在中文維基百科創建獨立條目。互聯網站內容包括但不限於網絡漫畫、播客、網誌、網絡論壇、電子雜誌及其它傳播媒體、入門網站及網頁寄存服務。就本指引而言，任何僅在互聯網上發放的內容皆在考慮範圍內。^[1]

維基人通常反對把維基百科當作廣告工具，而維基百科不是宣傳工具已是存在已久的一項正式方針。廣告內容會被改寫以符合中立觀點，或被刪除。^[2]

維基百科不是一個網頁目錄，即是說它不是一個專門提供連結往其它網站及把那些連結分類的網站。維基百科不是一個鏡像網站，也不是連結、圖像或媒體檔案的儲藏庫。那些只有外部連結及其內容的簡短介紹的條目會被改寫或刪除。

有時候這些條目會被提請刪除，維基百科編輯者可按照本文所述的條件把它們提交Wikipedia:刪除投票和請求。

條件

在中文維基百科，互聯網上內容的關注度^[3]是根據以下條件而定：

該內容本身已成為多份非不重要的出版物所載內容的主題，而出版物上那些內容的來源與該網站本身無關聯；或者，該內容本身影響了多份非不重要的出版物所載內容的主題，並在報導中被明確提及，而且在較長時間內一直有一定的關注度。
- 此條件包括任何形式的出版物，諸如報刊及雜誌文章、書本、電視紀錄片及消費者監察團體已出版的報告。^[4]下列情形除外：
  - 媒體刊載的是該網上內容或網站的官方新聞稿及/或廣告。^[5]
  - 不全面提及，諸如(1)報刊文章僅簡單提到該等網上內容的網址；(2)報刊文章僅簡單報道該等網上內容的更新或可取得的時間；(3)該等內容本質的簡短介紹或僅刊載網址及網站；或(4)在互聯網目錄或線上商店找到的內容描述。

上面列出的是Wikipedia:關注度的足以收錄的中心條件。如果可以滿足以下一些條件，關於某一網上內容的充足可靠資料應該可以找到。滿足以下至少一項條件的網上內容可以成為維基百科的獨立條目，因為關於它的可供查證的資料應該不少，而公眾對它應該會有一點興趣。

該網站或內容已得到一份出版物或一個團體頒發一個著名的及獨立的獎項。^[6]
該內容由一個著名的及與創立者無關連的媒體分發，這可以是一份線上報刊或雜誌、一間線上出版商或一個線上廣播者。^[7]

條目內容需要提供証據，証明條目主角滿足至少一項上面列出的條件，這可以在內文加入連結，也可以在「參考資料」或「外部連結」提供。即使一個完整的網站滿足上述條件，它的組成部份（論壇、文章、分段）也不一定具知名度及不一定值得為這些部份各自創建獨立條目。

Notes

^ Content which has been packaged into material form, such as onto CD, DVD or book form, but which is still primarily only available for sale via the internet, still falls under these guidelines. If such packaging of the product is widely available for sale in major brick and mortar retailers, then it should be considered a product, for which see Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations).
^ Websites or content which fail these guidelines but are linked to a topic or subject which does merit inclusion may be 重定向 to that topic or subject rather than be listed for deletion.
^ Discussions of websites should be incorporated (with a redirect if necessary) into an article about the parent organization, unless the domain-name of the website is the most common way of referring to the organization. For example, yahoo.com is a redirect to Yahoo!. On the other hand Drugstore.com is a standalone page.
^
Examples:
- The webcomic When I Am King has been reviewed by The Guardian, Playboy, The Comics Journal, and Wired.
- The blog Daily Kos has been covered by Los Angeles Times, Time, The Washington Post, U.S. News & World Report, and The New York Times.
^ Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the company, corporation, product, or service. (See Wikipedia:Autobiography for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.) The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the content or site notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it.
^ Examples of such awards: Eisner Awards or Webby Awards. See Category:Awards for more. Being nominated for an award in multiple years is also considered an indicator of notability.
^ Content that is distributed by independent online sites will almost certainly satisfy the first criterion. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of such content will be complete regardless. For example, Ricky Gervais had a podcast distributed by The Guardian. Such distributions should be nontrivial. Although GeoCities and Newgrounds are exceedingly well known, hosting content on them is trivial.

[1] Content which has been packaged into material form, such as onto CD, DVD or book form, but which is still primarily only available for sale via the internet, still falls under these guidelines. If such packaging of the product is widely available for sale in major brick and mortar retailers, then it should be considered a product, for which see Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations).

[2] Websites or content which fail these guidelines but are linked to a topic or subject which does merit inclusion may be 重定向 to that topic or subject rather than be listed for deletion.

[3] Discussions of websites should be incorporated (with a redirect if necessary) into an article about the parent organization, unless the domain-name of the website is the most common way of referring to the organization. For example, yahoo.com is a redirect to Yahoo!. On the other hand Drugstore.com is a standalone page.

[4] Examples:
The webcomic When I Am King has been reviewed by The Guardian, Playboy, The Comics Journal, and Wired.

The blog Daily Kos has been covered by Los Angeles Times, Time, The Washington Post, U.S. News & World Report, and The New York Times.

[5] The webcomic When I Am King has been reviewed by The Guardian, Playboy, The Comics Journal, and Wired.

[6] The blog Daily Kos has been covered by Los Angeles Times, Time, The Washington Post, U.S. News & World Report, and The New York Times.

[5] Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the company, corporation, product, or service. (See Wikipedia:Autobiography for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.) The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the content or site notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it.

[6] Examples of such awards: Eisner Awards or Webby Awards. See Category:Awards for more. Being nominated for an award in multiple years is also considered an indicator of notability.

[7] Content that is distributed by independent online sites will almost certainly satisfy the first criterion. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of such content will be complete regardless. For example, Ricky Gervais had a podcast distributed by The Guardian. Such distributions should be nontrivial. Although GeoCities and Newgrounds are exceedingly well known, hosting content on them is trivial.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

維基百科:關注度 (網站)

條件

相關頁面

Notes